Know what matters before you decide. Dimori brings together the facts, weighs the options, and gets missing answers, so your team can choose with a clearer picture.
Missing answer receivedVendor B confirmed migration before renewal. Source added to brief.
Illustrative decision · Sample vendors and figures
Make sense of unfamiliar decisions.See the requirements, evidence, and tradeoffs that matter.
Stop chasing every missing answer.Dimori coordinates follow-ups and tracks what comes back.
Keep the reasoning with the decision.Know what was chosen, why, and what happened next.
One decision, from question to choice
A lower quote. A bigger decision.
Your team needs a new software vendor. Price is clear. The work involved, the timing, and the right choice are less obvious.
Start with what matters
The right questions, before the comparison.
Start from a vendor-selection template. Dimori uses its requirements and your team's priorities to review proposals, the current contract, and the conversations so far.
It puts the tradeoffs in view and flags a gap that could change the choice.
Add documents and involve your team. Conversations can happen in meetings or on your own schedule.
What this decision needs
Total costVendor A: $24k · Vendor B: $30k per year
Compared
Work required from your teamIT estimates 80 hours for Vendor A
Reviewed
Security requirementsBoth vendors meet the team's requirements
Checked
Migration before renewalVendor B's proposal has no committed date
Answer needed
Move the decision forward
A missing commitment becomes a follow-up.
Dimori asks the operations lead to confirm Vendor B's migration date, tracks the request, and reminds the owner while it is outstanding.
When the answer arrives, Dimori adds it to the comparison with its source. Your team can see what changed.
AI agents gather answers and coordinate the work needed to reach a decision.
Follow-up · Migration commitment
Confirm launch before renewalOwner: Operations lead · Due Thursday
Received
“We can complete migration by May 20. Migration support is included in the annual fee.”
Vendor B · Written confirmation · May 2
Decision updated: Vendor B can meet the renewal deadline. Your team must provide access by May 6.
Choose with the reasoning in view
One brief. A choice your team can explain.
Review the options, each person's concerns, and the answers gathered along the way. Follow the sources behind the claims.
Record the choice and assign the next steps. Later, Dimori brings the outcome back into view so the next vendor decision starts with what you learned.
The decision stays connected to the people, evidence, and actions behind it.
Decision recorded
Choose Vendor B. The higher annual fee includes migration support and preserves our team's capacity.
Provide migration accessIT lead · May 6
Assigned
Confirm migration is on trackOperations lead · May 13
Scheduled
Review the outcomeDid launch happen on time? Was support sufficient?
After launch
What you get at decision time
The choice. The tradeoffs. The reasons.
A decision brief that brings together what your team knows, where people disagree, and what still needs attention.
Understand the choice quickly.
Compare the options against what matters to your team.
Check the evidence yourself.
Trace the claims to documents, conversations, and responses.
Know what you are committing to.
See the conditions and next steps alongside the decision.
Decision brief · 03 MayFor review
Select a customer support platform
Prepared for Operations, Finance, and IT
The tradeoff
Vendor B costs $6,000 more per year. It includes migration support and a confirmed launch date. Vendor A costs less but requires an estimated 80 hours from IT.
What the team thinks
FinancePrefers Vendor A's lower recurring cost.
ITPrefers Vendor B to preserve capacity for the current project.
OperationsPrioritizes migration before the existing contract renews.
Resolved before the decision
Vendor B confirmed migration by May 20, within the annual fee.
Condition to carry forward
IT must provide access by May 6 for Vendor B to meet that date.
View supporting sources
1. Vendor A annual proposal: $24,000; migration excluded. 2. Vendor B annual proposal: $30,000; migration included. 3. IT review: estimated 80 internal hours for Vendor A. 4. Vendor B written confirmation, May 2: May 20 migration, subject to access by May 6. 5. Team review: Finance, IT, and Operations perspectives.
Sample source excerpts for this illustrative decision.
Across your organization
Different decisions. The same need for a clearer picture.
Dimori brings the requirements, people, and evidence together for the kind of decision you need to make.